<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ewald.tienkamp.nl &#187; upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/tag/upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl</link>
	<description>Gentoo Linux and whatever else I think needs to be shot into cyberspace.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gentoo blocker: AdobeFlash-10.1 license</title>
		<link>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/2010/06/21/gentoo-blocker-adobeflash-10-1-license/</link>
		<comments>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/2010/06/21/gentoo-blocker-adobeflash-10-1-license/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emerge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lately, my Adobe Flash on Gentoo amd64 complained about being blocked by the Adobe Flash 10.0 license and since yesterday the 10.1 one. Blocked by a license? Had never seen that before&#8230; As of yesterday, emerge -uDN world spits out the following for me: !!! The following updates are masked by LICENSE changes: - www-plugins/adobe-flash-10.1.53.64 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, my Adobe Flash on Gentoo amd64 complained about being blocked by the Adobe Flash 10.0 license and since yesterday the 10.1 one. Blocked by a license? Had never seen that before&#8230;<br />
<span id="more-164"></span><br />
As of yesterday, emerge -uDN world spits out the following for me:<br />
<code>!!! The following updates are masked by LICENSE changes:<br />
- www-plugins/adobe-flash-10.1.53.64 (masked by: AdobeFlash-10.1 license(s))<br />
A copy of the 'AdobeFlash-10.1' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/AdobeFlash-10.1'.</code><br />
<code>!!! The following installed packages are masked:<br />
- www-plugins/adobe-flash-10.0.45.2 (masked by: AdobeFlash-10 license(s))<br />
A copy of the 'AdobeFlash-10' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/AdobeFlash-10'.<br />
</code><br />
Now I could have looked into the 10.0 error, but hey, it was already installed, so who cares. I could have also paid attention to the notice below the block telling me to look into &#8220;<em>the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook</em>&#8220;. I just couldn&#8217;t be bothered. But, since 10.1 popped up, I resorted to searching the web in hopes of finding a quick and easy way to solve this blocker.</p>
<p>Turns out that just yesterday, the <a href="http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6323437.html#6323437">Spanish GFO presented the correct way to fix this</a>. You can simply create the file /etc/portage/package.license and add a line that accepts the AdobeFlash-10.1 license for the Adobe Flash package in portage:<br />
<code>echo "www-plugins/adobe-flash AdobeFlash-10.1" >> /etc/portage/package.license</code></p>
<p>Just add the line with the command above and rerun emerge -uDN world to upgrade Adobe Flash.</p>
<p><strong>Update Jun 21, 2010 @ 14:00:</strong> You will, however, need the nspluginwrapper package to use Adobe Flash in a 64-bit browser. Also note <a href="https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=322855">this bugreport in special</a> and <a href="https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=adobe+flash">the other bugreports</a> in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/2010/06/21/gentoo-blocker-adobeflash-10-1-license/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Couldn&#8217;t load XPCOM&#8221; after Firefox upgrade</title>
		<link>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/2009/07/27/couldnt-load-xpcom-after-firefox-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/2009/07/27/couldnt-load-xpcom-after-firefox-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ewald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dependencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revdep-rebuild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPCOM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Mozilla Firefox 3.5(.1) was finally unmasked in Portage, I upgraded from 3.0. Unfortunately, after the update, Firefox would not start anymore and when started from a terminal, it would leave me with a cryptic &#8220;Couldn&#8217;t load XPCOM.&#8221;. Searching around for this error did not provide me with many easy to apply solutions. I found [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Mozilla Firefox 3.5(.1) was finally unmasked in Portage, I upgraded from 3.0. Unfortunately, after the update, Firefox would not start anymore and when started from a terminal, it would leave me with a cryptic &#8220;Couldn&#8217;t load XPCOM.&#8221;.<br />
<span id="more-67"></span><br />
Searching around for this error did not provide me with many easy to apply solutions. I found quite a few forumposts and a Mozilla Dev page on this specific error.</p>
<p>In this case, the forumposts lead me to the rather easy solution: if, when using Gentoo, you encounter a problem with dependencies, simply run revdep-rebuild:<br />
<code>revdep-rebuild -p</code><br />
In this case, <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/">nss</a> turned out to be the culprit and after a remerge (rerun revdep-rebuild without the -p flag) Firefox 3.5 would load as expected.</p>
<p>If you happen to find this page, but are not a Gentoo, but a different Linux or even a Windows or Mac OSX user, try some of the suggestions suitable for your OS, found in the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Troubleshooting_XPCOM_components_registration">Mozilla Developers Center</a>.</p>
<p>[edit]28 July: according to the visitor numbers, I&#8217;m not the only one to experience this error. If people want to let me know whether this did or did not solve the issue for them, leave a comment below.[/edit]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ewald.tienkamp.nl/2009/07/27/couldnt-load-xpcom-after-firefox-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

